DemonicDerek
November 27th, 2007, 09:43 PM
My thoughts on the Blu-Ray Vs. HD-DVD War are two basic things, one is that the war needs to end soon or we need more dual format players (They play both Blu-Ray and HD-DVD, DVD as well I think). I say we need more of them because the ones right now are really expensive. I can't wait until the war either ends or dual format becomes common because if the war ends then no more worrying about whether or not the type of drive you are going to buy is going to be faded out (because there will only be one to chose from).
I honestly think Blu-Ray is better, and the funny part of it all is that I AM A MICROSOFT FANBOY! HD-DVD I think was either created by Microsoft or is just heavily supported by it. Anyways, Blu-Ray is better mainly because there is more GB per disc than HD-DVD, and that is really about it. The only downsides to it are that its hard layer that protects the indentations on the disc is rather thin and so could be easier to destroy than HD-DVD. I don't see this much of a problem because the layer is harder than acrylic (or so I have read) and also if you take care of your discs then you won't have any worries.
I honestly think Blu-Ray is better, and the funny part of it all is that I AM A MICROSOFT FANBOY! HD-DVD I think was either created by Microsoft or is just heavily supported by it. Anyways, Blu-Ray is better mainly because there is more GB per disc than HD-DVD, and that is really about it. The only downsides to it are that its hard layer that protects the indentations on the disc is rather thin and so could be easier to destroy than HD-DVD. I don't see this much of a problem because the layer is harder than acrylic (or so I have read) and also if you take care of your discs then you won't have any worries.